Showing posts with label Under the Dome. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Under the Dome. Show all posts

Under the Dome

Monday, July 8, 2013


Under the Dome
by Stephen King
★★★★

SPOILERS AHEAD – You’ve been warned!

What a ride! This 1,000 page tome grips you from the first chapter until the final pages. The small town of Chester’s Mill in Maine is thrown into turmoil when an invisible dome descends over it, trapping the citizens inside. King gives us a massive cast of characters (seriously, look at the photo of just one page of my notes below), that is at first overwhelming. Quickly readers can catch on to who the big players are and soon become deeply invested in their lives.

There is the town’s “hero” Big Jim Rennie who reveals himself as the sadistic brains behind all the town’s dark operations. There’s Barbie, an ex-military guy trying to leave town when the Dome appears. Julia runs the local newspaper and Rusty and his wife Linda work at the hospital and police station respectively. Junior is Big Jim’s twisted son and Phil “Chef” cooks meth on the out skirts of town. Rose runs the diner, her sister Andrea is addicted to pain killers and Col. Cox is the liaison on the other side of the Dome. Now add in about 30 more characters and you’ve got the bulk of the cast.

“Small towns harbor small imaginations. Grace Metalious and Sherwood Anderson were right about that.”

For me the power of the story was in watching the thin veil of societal niceties crumble as the danger increased. Big Jim worked hard to heighten fear and remove any sense of safety that the town might feel. He’s a master manipulator. Once that was complete he positioned himself as the savior and protector of Chester’s Mill and all of the town’s “sheep” looked to him to lead them through this crisis. He beefed up the police force with brutal idiots and got rid of anyone willing to challenge his authority.

“She realized – what scared her the most – was how fast this was happening.”

Like I’ve said before, the best science-fiction gives us an extreme situation that highlights peoples' true personalities and tendencies. The catalyst is usually secondary; it’s really a psychological study of how people react in times of stress. Whatever their natural inclination is, be it cruelty or kindness, it is enhanced by the disaster.  

I think it's very important to remember that Junior committed his first murder before he knew anything about the Dome. Both he and his father are undeniably evil, just in different ways. Big Jim Remy commits murder when he feels threatened and he wants to secure his power. Junior kills because it’s a compulsion caused by his tumor.

Barbie's military background becomes essential and the town begins to panic. The fact that he'd seen riots during his time at war helped him know how to handle the crowd. You can’t reason with a mob, but his calm reaction when others panicked helped save lives.

“She watched her town lose its mind, and afterward she would never be the same person.”




One aspect I loved was the comparison between Andrea’s struggle with addiction to pain medication and the town as a whole “body.” Andi realizes that her body has been telling her it is in pain so that she will continue taking the medicine. Her addiction is fueled by her psychological need. She compares herself with the town as a whole. Big Jim has made himself the “brain” of the body and is trying to convince the rest of the body that it is in danger.

The explanation of the Dome was my least favorite part of the book. I think it was just an unnecessary complication in the book. I wish he’d just said it was some government weapon testing gone wrong or something. I think the best aspect of the book is the interaction between the people and adding in an extraterrestrial element at the last minute was distracting and didn’t make a lot of sense.

King has a definite style and there were some parts that reminded me so much of The Stand. It had that same sense of impending doom, building towards and inevitable conflict without an easy resolution. Again he gave us tons of characters and had no qualms about killing them off. He featured dogs in key roles and gave us a reluctant hero and an anti-hero who is charming on the surface. The similarities between the two books were striking.

A few other random thoughts:

- Stephen King has an incredible way of making you care for even the most pathetic of characters. Everything that happened to Sammy’s character was just horrible.

- King is ruthless when it comes to killing off main characters. Some of my favorites, like Andrea and Brenda Perkins (and Audrey the dog) didn’t make it.

- The librarian’s name is Melissa and she goes by Lissa, which is what I’ve gone by my whole life. I’ve never heard of anyone else using that nickname!

- Ollie, oh my gosh that poor cow-kid! His whole story just broke my heart.

- I loved how Big Jim’s life ended. Up until the last moment he made selfish decisions and because of that he was alone and haunted by all of his crimes.

BOTTOM LINE: Any book that can keep you enthralled for 1,000 pages is a success in my mind. Despite a somewhat weak ending, the book was a gripping look at the way people react in a crisis. The mob mentality and the blind trust that people can exhibit when terrified is both real and disturbing. Another great read from the King.

“Living under the Dome intensified everything. Already it seemed to Linda that they had been under it not for days but years. The outside world was fading like a dream when you woke up.”  

“… in my experience, town politicians know a little, the town cops know a lot, and the local newspaper editor knows everything.”

“What she understood was that grief, no matter how genuine, did not seem to impede a politician’s flow of bullshit.”

Photo of my notes and a map of the town from the book.


The Green Mile and the DomeAlong

Thursday, June 20, 2013


In addition to my review of The Green Mile, I'm joining in the DomeAlong fun hosted by Coffee and a Book Chick here. A bunch of us are reading Under the Dome through July 27 in anticipation of the upcoming television version of the book. 


The Green Mile
by Stephen King
★★★★★

There are books that put you into reading slumps and there are those that get you out of them. This is the latter. I couldn’t put it down, I didn’t want it to end and I was thinking about the characters long after I was done with it. There’s not much more you can ask from a book.
  
Our narrator Paul Edgecombe introduces us to the green mile and its 1932 residents. The “Green Mile” is a death row penitentiary, nicknamed for its long hallway paved with green linoleum. It’s full of the worst dredges of humanity and some of the kindest. Paul runs the mile with his fellow guards, keeping the prisoners in check and running an occasional execution via electric chair whenever someone’s time is up.

The convicts include William "Billy the Kid" Wharton, one of the most twisted individuals I’ve encountered in a novel. Then there’s Eduard Delacroix, who has made his mistakes, but now spends his time training his sweet pet mouse, Mr. Jingles, to do tricks. John Coffey is the other notable inmate. He’s a huge black man with a gentle spirit and an odd gift.

In addition to the criminals there are a handful of guards, only one of which truly instills fear in the reader. Percy Wetmore is the nephew of a high-up politician and has wormed his way into this job. I don’t think I’ve ever despised a character more than I did with Percy. He is a cruel coward. Paul is reflecting on this eventful year decades later and he sees Percy’s malice mirrored in Brad Dolan, an employee of the nursing home where he now lives. It’s such a powerful reminder that those kinds of people are everywhere, in all works of life. They thrive on manipulation and intimidation.

One interesting aspect of this novel is the format in which it was written. King decided to try writing a serialized novel. This is how many books were written during the 19th century (Dickens, Thackeray, etc.) and so King split the book into six sections. Each one was published as a paperback with a different title. He published one each month for six month in 1996. The only drawback to this method is that some elements feel repetitive when read as one consecutive novel. King reiterates some plot points as reminders of what happened in the last installment, but it’s not too distracting when taking in context of the original format.

BOTTOM LINE: If The Stand made me second guess my preconceived notions about King’s talent as a writer, this novel solidified him as a brilliant storyteller in my mind. I was so invested in the story and it broke my heart over and over again. I loved reading this and I highly recommend the audiobook version read by Frank Mueller.

**I’ll add that this is one of the few movies I’ve seen that really does the novel justice. Obviously some things had to be cut, but I think it does a wonderful job with the story.  

DomeAlong hosted here